Prompt for v0 Wireframes: The "Policies" Section1. Overall Vision & StyleProduct: A web-based dashboard for an enterprise-grade, self-custody digital asset platform (io.vault).Target User: The primary user for this section is the Workspace Admin, who is responsible for setting up and managing security and transaction policies.Core Style: The design should be clean, professional, and enterprise-grade. It needs to be information-dense and precise, prioritizing clarity and usability over flashy visuals. The aesthetic should inspire confidence and security. This is a tool for managing high-value assets, and the design must reflect that.Key Components: Use standard, intuitive web components like tables, modals, dropdowns, multi-select fields, and clear call-to-action buttons.2. Main NavigationCreate a left-hand side navigation bar.Include a primary navigation item labeled "Policies".When a user clicks on "Policies," it should expand to reveal three sub-navigation items:WhitelistsTransaction PoliciesApproval Groups3. Screen 1: WhitelistsThis screen is for managing approved destination addresses.Default View: A table listing all whitelisting requests.Primary Action: A prominent button in the top right labeled "+ New Whitelist Request".Table Columns:Network/ChainSource VaultDestination AddressDestination Identity (The name of the entity)Permitted Asset(s)Status (e.g., "Pending Approval", "Active", "Rejected")Requested On (Date-time of request)Requested By (Initiator)New Whitelist Request Flow (Modal):Title: "New Whitelist Request"Fields:Source Vault: A dropdown menu to select the source vault.Source Address (Optional): A dropdown to select a specific address within the vault. This is optional to allow for vault-wide whitelists.Destination Addresses: This should be a dynamic list component allowing the user to add multiple destination addresses in a single request.For each entry in the list, include:Destination Address: Text input field.Destination Identity: Text input field for the entity's name.Permitted Asset(s): A multi-select dropdown or checkboxes where the user must select one or more assets (e.g., BTC, ETH, USDC) for that address.An "+ Add Another Address" button should be present.Actions: A Submit for Approval button (sends to Governance Vault) and a Cancel button.4. Screen 2: Transaction PoliciesThis screen is for managing the rules that govern outgoing transactions.Default View: A table listing all transaction policies. The key feature here is that the policies must beorderable to reflect the "first-match" principle. The table should support drag-and-drop reordering.Primary Action: A button labeled "+ Create New Policy".Table Columns:Priority (Displaying the order, e.g., 1, 2, 3)Policy NameConditions Summary (A human-readable summary of the rule, e.g., "Amount > $50k AND Asset is USDC")Outcome (Reject or Escalate)Status ("Active", "Pending Approval", "Archived")Create/Edit Policy Flow (Full Page View):Title: "Create New Transaction Policy"Policy Name: A simple text input field.Conditions ("IF") Section: A rule-builder interface.Allow the user to add multiple conditions using parameters like:Source vault(s)Destination address type (e.g., Whitelisted, OTA, etc.)Network/ChainToken/asset typeAmount (e.g., is greater than, is less than, is between)User RoleTime Frame (e.g., Weekends, Work Hours)Outcome ("THEN") Section:Radio buttons to select the outcome:Reject or Escalate.Conditional Field: If Escalate is selected, a new section appears:Approval Groups: A multi-select dropdown to choose one or more Approval Groups.Approval Logic: Radio buttons for AND (all selected groups must approve) or OR (any one of the selected groups must approve).Simulation: A button labeled "Simulate Policy" should be present. This would open a modal where the user can input transaction details to see what the outcome of the policy would be.Actions: Submit for Approval, Save Draft, and Cancel buttons.5. Screen 3: Approval GroupsThis screen is for managing the groups of users who can manually approve escalated transactions.Default View: A card-based or table view of all created Approval Groups.Primary Action: A button labeled "+ Create Approval Group".Group Display: Each group in the list should clearly show:Group NameMembers (e.g., showing user icons or names)Approval Threshold (e.g., "Requires 3 of 5 members to approve")Status ("Active", "Pending Approval")Create/Edit Approval Group Flow (Modal):Title: "Create Approval Group"Fields:Group Name: Text input field.Add Members: A search/multi-select dropdown to find and add users. This list must only containSigning Admins and Users (API or human) ; it must excludeWorkspace Admins and Viewers.Set Approval Threshold: A number input field. The UI should provide context, for example: Approval Threshold: [ 3 ] of 5 Members.Actions: Submit for Approval (sends to Governance Vault) and Cancel buttons.
Of course. Here is a comprehensive dashboard for managing security and transaction policies, built with Next.js and shadcn/ui components.
The design is clean, professional, and information-dense, reflecting the enterprise-grade nature of a digital asset platform. It includes the three requested sections: Whitelists, Transaction Policies, and Approval Groups, each with its own dedicated page and corresponding creation flows.
This application provides a robust foundation for your policy management dashboard. The code is organized into logical components and pages, making it easy to extend and connect to a real backend. You can now add the necessary server actions or API routes to handle data persistence and business logic.
Prompt for v1 UI Iteration: Perfecting the Policies SectionOverall Goal: To evolve the v0 UI from a structural wireframe into a fully functional and intuitive interface. This iteration focuses on implementing key interactive components, adding missing user flows (like editing and viewing details), and refining the UI to provide better visual feedback, aligning perfectly with the PRD and "gotcha" analysis.1. Global UI/UX EnhancementsStatus Badges: Standardize the color-coding for status badges across all three pages for consistency.Active: Use a green background with dark green text.Pending Approval: Use a yellow/amber background with dark yellow/amber text.Rejected: Use a red background with dark red text.Archived: Use a neutral grey background with dark grey text.Empty States: For all three main pages, design an "empty state" view for when no items (groups, policies, whitelists) have been created yet. This view should contain a title, a short description, and a prominent "Create..." call-to-action button.2. Approval Groups Page (/policies/approval-groups)The card view is a great start. Let's make it interactive and fully functional.Display Cards:Click Action: Make the entire Card component clickable. Clicking a card should open a modal or a side-sheet showing the group's details and allowing for edits."Edit" Button: Add a subtle "Edit" button or a "..." menu on each card to make the edit action more discoverable."Create/Edit Approval Group" Modal:Add Members Component: Replace the placeholder Input with a rich, multi-select search component.This component must allow searching for users by name.It must filter the user list to only include those with theSigning Admin or User roles, as per the requirements.Selected users should appear as tags within the input area.Dynamic Threshold Counter: The "of X Members" text next to the threshold input must dynamically update to reflect the number of members currently selected in the "Add Members" component.3. Transaction Policies PageThis section requires the most significant functional enhancements.A. Policies List View (/policies/transaction-policies)Row Actions: To each row in the policies table, add a "..." (kebab menu) button on the far right. This menu should contain actions:EditSimulate (Opens the simulation modal pre-filled with this policy's context).Archive (Should trigger a confirmation modal).View History (A placeholder for version history).Filtering/Tabs: Add tabs above the table to filter the list by Status ("Active", "Pending Approval", "Archived"). This will be essential for keeping the "Active" list clean and manageable.B. Create/Edit Policy View (.../new)This view needs to become a dynamic rule builder.Dynamic Conditions ("IF" Section):Complete Parameter List: The Parameter dropdown must include all options specified in the PRD: Source vault(s), Source Address(es), Address type, Destination address, Network/Chain, Token/asset type, Amount, User Role, and External Risk Score (formerly Chainalysis Score).Contextual Value Input: The Value input field must change dynamically based on the selected Parameter.If Parameter is "Amount," Value should be a number input.If Parameter is "Token/asset type," Value should be a multi-select dropdown of available assets.IfParameter is "User Role," Value should be a dropdown of roles (Workspace Admin, Signing Admin, etc.).Escalation Outcome ("THEN" Section):Multi-Select Approval Groups: The "Approval Groups" selection must be a multi-select dropdown, allowing the admin to choose one or more groups as required by the PRD.Enable/Disable AND/OR: The AND/OR logic radio buttons should be disabled if only one Approval Group is selected and enabled only when two or more are chosen.Bottom Actions Bar:When editing an existing policy, the "Submit for Approval" button should be renamed to "Submit Changes for Approval."The "Save Draft" button is crucial for complex policies that an admin may need to return to later.4. Whitelists Page (/policies/whitelists)This page is functionally close but needs the final components and a detail view.Main Table View:Clickable Rows: Make each row in the Table clickable. Clicking a row should open a modal/side-sheet with a detailed, read-only view of the request.Detail View Contents: This view must show all the table information plus the initiator/rejecters/abstainers and the date-time of the final decision, which is critical for auditability."New Whitelist Request" Modal:Multi-Select for Assets: Replace the placeholder Select component for "Permitted Asset(s)" with a functional multi-select component (e.g., a dropdown with checkboxes) as this is a core requirement.
Of course. I've iterated on the previous design to create a more functional and intuitive interface for the Policies section. This update incorporates your feedback, including standardized status badges, empty states, interactive components, and refined user flows for editing and viewing details.
Here is the updated Policies section: