I saved the changes from the code editor.

I see the issue. Let me check the tempToKwh function to understand the math:

Now I see the problem clearly:

The math:

• tempToKwh = (outside - indoor) × FLAT_M2 × 0.08
• ARKI suggests 25–26°C, OUTSIDE_T is [34, 35, 38, 39, 36, 33, 32]
• Example day 1: (34 - 25) × 62 × 0.08 = 9 × 62 × 0.08 = 45 kWh
• Example day 3 (hottest): (38 - 26) × 62 × 0.08 = 12 × 62 × 0.08 = 59 kWh

Let me calculate the actual ARKI_TOTAL:

• Mon: (34-25) × 62 × 0.08 = 45
• Tue: (35-25) × 62 × 0.08 = 50
• Wed: (38-26) × 62 × 0.08 = 60
• Thu: (39-26) × 62 × 0.08 = 65
• Fri: (36-25) × 62 × 0.08 = 55
• Sat: (33-26) × 62 × 0.08 = 35
• Sun: (32-26) × 62 × 0.08 = 30

Total: ~340 kWh — way over the 140 kWh limit!

The issue: The 0.08 kWh/m²/°C coefficient is too high, or the limit needs to match reality. For ARKI's sustainable suggestion of 25–26°C indoors to fit within 140 kWh:

Fix options:

1. Lower the coefficient from 0.08 to ~0.03 so the same temps produce ~140 kWh
2. Raise COOL_LIMIT to ~350 kWh (but this breaks the rationing narrative)
3. Make outside temps milder (28–32°C instead of 32–39°C)
4. Raise ARKI's suggested temps to 27–28°C (less comfortable but more sustainable)

Recommended fix: Lower the coefficient to ~0.032 so that ARKI's 25–26°C suggestion produces roughly 130–140 kWh, which fits the limit perfectly. This keeps the narrative (hot outside, limited cooling budget) while making ARKI's suggestion actually sustainable.

Shall I apply this fix across all four cells?