Great! Now that the INDEXNOW_KEY environment variable has been added to your Vercel project, the IndexNow integration will work seamlessly. Let me explain what's happening with the improvements I've implemented:
INDEXNOW_KEY environment variable as the primary key for IndexNow verification.The key is served through two routes:
/api/indexnow - For API verification/[key].txt - For direct key verification by search enginesURLs are automatically submitted to search engines in these scenarios:
The performance optimizations should help address the issues shown in your metrics:
The SEO improvements address the technical issues you mentioned:
Verify IndexNow Integration: You can check if your site is being properly indexed by visiting:
https://www.bing.com/indexnow/The implementation is now complete and should automatically handle all the SEO and performance optimizations you requested without requiring manual intervention.
[00:44:04.571] Running build in Washington, D.C., USA (East) – iad1
[00:44:04.689] Retrieving list of deployment files...
[00:44:05.420] Downloading 95 deployment files...
[00:44:09.202] Restored build cache from previous deployment (HmStZQq19y2JYCuiXUTypbKb36sL)
[00:44:09.284] Running "vercel build"
[00:44:09.652] Vercel CLI 41.2.2
[00:44:09.977] Running "install" command: bun install...
[00:44:10.012] bun install v1.2.4 (fd9a5ea6)
[00:44:10.024] Resolving dependencies
[00:44:14.982] Resolved, downloaded and extracted [1636]
[00:44:14.983] warn: incorrect peer dependency "react@19.0.0"
[00:44:14.983]
[00:44:14.983] warn: incorrect peer dependency "react-dom@19.0.0"
[00:44:14.983]
[00:44:14.983] warn: incorrect peer dependency "react-dom@19.0.0"
[00:44:14.983]
[00:44:14.983] warn: incorrect peer dependency "react@19.0.0"
[00:44:14.983]
[00:44:14.983] warn: incorrect peer dependency "react@19.0.0"
[00:44:14.983]
[00:44:14.983] warn: incorrect peer dependency "date-fns@4.1.0"
[00:44:14.991] Saved lockfile
[00:44:14.997]
[00:44:14.997] + path@0.12.7
[00:44:14.997]
[00:44:14.997] 3 packages installed [4.99s]
[00:44:15.016] Detected Next.js version: 15.1.0
[00:44:15.017] Running "bun run build"
[00:44:15.023] $ next build
[00:44:15.784] ▲ Next.js 15.1.0
[00:44:15.785] - Experiments (use with caution):
[00:44:15.786] · webpackBuildWorker
[00:44:15.786] · parallelServerCompiles
[00:44:15.786] · parallelServerBuildTraces
[00:44:15.786]
[00:44:15.856] Creating an optimized production build ...
[00:44:30.856] ✓ Compiled successfully
[00:44:30.862] Skipping validation of types
[00:44:30.863] Skipping linting
[00:44:31.273] Collecting page data ...
[00:44:32.445] Generating static pages (0/13) ...
[00:44:33.101] Generating static pages (3/13)
[00:44:33.112] Generating static pages (6/13)
[00:44:33.583] Generating static pages (9/13)
[00:44:33.585] ✓ Generating static pages (13/13)
[00:44:33.601] Finalizing page optimization ...
[00:44:33.602] Collecting build traces ...
[00:44:37.195]
[00:44:37.210] Route (app) Size First Load JS
[00:44:37.210] ┌ ○ / 6.62 kB 148 kB
[00:44:37.210] ├ ○ /_not-found 148 B 106 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ƒ /[key].txt 148 B 106 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ○ /access 5.03 kB 152 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ○ /admin/indexnow 3.61 kB 116 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ƒ /api/auto-submit 148 B 106 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ƒ /api/cron/indexnow 148 B 106 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ƒ /api/indexnow 148 B 106 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ƒ /api/telegram-posts 148 B 106 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ ○ /sitemap.xml 0 B 0 B
[00:44:37.211] └ ○ /telegram 3.66 kB 158 kB
[00:44:37.211] + First Load JS shared by all 105 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ chunks/4bd1b696-843098d36b80feb3.js 52.9 kB
[00:44:37.211] ├ chunks/517-f9e4daa1855dc428.js 50.3 kB
[00:44:37.212] └ other shared chunks (total) 2.15 kB
[00:44:37.212]
[00:44:37.212]
[00:44:37.212] ƒ Middleware 32.3 kB
[00:44:37.212]
[00:44:37.212] ○ (Static) prerendered as static content
[00:44:37.212] ƒ (Dynamic) server-rendered on demand
[00:44:37.212]
[00:44:37.407] Traced Next.js server files in: 137.345ms
[00:44:37.559] Created all serverless functions in: 150.628ms
[00:44:37.605] Collected static files (public/, static/, .next/static): 5.966ms
[00:44:37.651] Build Completed in /vercel/output [28s]
[00:44:37.820] Deploying outputs...
[00:44:46.894] Error: Hobby accounts are limited to daily cron jobs. This cron expression (0 */12 * * *) would run more than once per day. Upgrade to pro to unlock all Cron Jobs features on Vercel.
[00:44:49.059] Build Failed
Hobby accounts are limited to daily cron jobs. This cron expression (0 */12 * * *) would run more than once per day. Upgrade to pro to unlock all Cron Jobs features on Vercel.
I see the issue. Vercel's Hobby accounts only allow cron jobs to run once per day, but we've set up a cron job to run every 12 hours (0 */12 * * *). Let's fix this by updating the vercel.json file to use a daily schedule instead:
I've fixed the issue with the cron job schedule that was causing the build to fail. Here are the changes I made:
Changed the IndexNow cron job to run once daily at 12:00 PM UTC instead of every 12 hours. This complies with Vercel's Hobby plan limitations which only allow cron jobs to run once per day.
{
"path": "/api/cron/indexnow",
"schedule": "0 12 * * *" // Runs at 12:00 PM UTC daily
}I've improved the sitemap submission function to be more comprehensive since it will only run once per day. It now:
Since the automated submission is now limited to once per day, I've added a "Submit Sitemap Now" button to the admin interface. This allows you to manually trigger the sitemap submission between the scheduled runs if needed.
These changes maintain all the functionality we implemented while complying with Vercel's Hobby plan limitations. The site will still get indexed regularly, and you have the option to manually submit URLs whenever you publish important new content.
Speed Insights flashusdtsender.xyz
+3
Production
Desktop
Mobile
Real Experience Score
65
First Contentful Paint
2.3
s
Largest Contentful Paint
4.08
s
Interaction to Next Paint
296
ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.24
First Input Delay
38
ms
Time to First Byte
0.65
s
Mobile
Real Experience Score
65
Needs Improvement
Below 90
Less than 75% of visits had a great experience.
Measures the overall user experience. To provide a good user experience, pages should have a RES of more than 90.
Learn more about RES P75 P90 P95 P99 Combobox Menu Last 7 Days Routes Paths RES
Poor
<50
No poor scores
Needs Improvement
50 - 90
/
2.3K
65
/access
404
59
/send
17
68
Great
90
/telegram
100
98
Countries
Poor
<50
Needs Improvement
50 - 90
India
362
87
Pakistan
217
75
Bangladesh
129
75
Mexico
124
70
United Arab Emirates
92
68
Great
90
This report is based on 2,851 data points Speed Insights flashusdtsender.xyz
+3
Production
Desktop
Mobile
Real Experience Score
79
First Contentful Paint
2.69
s
Largest Contentful Paint
3.98
s
Interaction to Next Paint
152
ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
0.05
First Input Delay
4
ms
Time to First Byte
0.63
s
Desktop
Real Experience Score
79
Needs Improvement
Below 90
Less than 75% of visits had a great experience.
Measures the overall user experience. To provide a good user experience, pages should have a RES of more than 90.
Learn more about RES P75 P90 P95 P99 Combobox Menu Last 7 Days Routes Paths RES
Poor
<50
No poor scores
Needs Improvement
50 - 90
/
660
76
/access
261
82
/telegram
5
71
Great
90
/_next/static/css
18
100
Countries
Poor
<50
Needs Improvement
50 - 90
Pakistan
162
70
India
158
59
France
52
86
Germany
33
86
United States of America
32
56
Great
90
This report is based on 948 data points Updated just nowDiscover what your real users are experiencing This URL Origin
Core Web Vitals Assessment: Failed
Expand view Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3.6 s
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) 298 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0.22
Other Notable Metrics First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2.2 s
Time to First Byte (TTFB) 0.5 s
Latest 28-day collection period Various mobile devices
Many samples ( Chrome UX Report ) Full visit durations Various network connections
All Chrome versions
Core Web Vitals Assessment:
Failed
Expand view Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4.5 s
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) 156 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0.04
Other Notable Metrics First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3.3 s
Time to First Byte (TTFB) 0.7 s
Latest 28-day collection period Various desktop devices
Many samples ( Chrome UX Report ) Full visit durations Various network connections
All Chrome versions Diagnostics Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 20 KiB Reduce unused JavaScript Potential savings of 144 KiB Reduce unused CSS Potential savings of 10 KiB Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 2 resources found Avoid serving legacy JavaScript to modern browsers Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 30 ms Avoid long main-thread tasks 3 long tasks found Avoid chaining critical requests 1 chain found Largest Contentful Paint element 1,130 ms Additional items to manually check (10) Hide Interactive controls are keyboard focusable Interactive elements indicate their purpose and state The page has a logical tab order Visual order on the page follows DOM order User focus is not accidentally trapped in a region The user's focus is directed to new content added to the page HTML5 landmark elements are used to improve navigation Offscreen content is hidden from assistive technology Custom controls have associated labels Custom controls have ARIA roles Co Content Based on your top 10-ranking rivals' data Focus on creating more informative content. Your rivals that rank higher than you in the Google top 10 for some of your target keywords are using long-form content on their webpages. Try to create more informative content. See detailed analysis Why should I do this? Difficulty: Make your text content more readable. Compared to your rivals, your text-based content is difficult to read and understand. Try to improve your content's readability. See detailed analysis Why should I do this? Difficulty: Provide a more relevant meta description. The meta description displayed in search results doesn't match your <meta> tag. Try to provide a more relevant meta description. Show more Keyword Your Meta Description SERP Meta Description flashusdtsender Flash USDT Sender is the ultimate platform for fast and secure USDT transactions. Simplify your crypto transfers today. Flash USDT Sender: Fast, secure cryptocurrency transfers across multiple networks. Featuring flash, flasher, flash btc, p2p flash, flash hub and more. Why should I do this? Difficulty: Use target keywords in <h1> tag. Your <h1> tag does not contain any of your target keywords. Try to add at least one of them to your <h1> tag. flashusdtsender See detailed analysis Why should I do this? Difficulty: Use target keywords in <title> tag. Your <title> tag does not contain any of your target keywords. Try to add at least one of them to your <title> tag. flashusdtsender See detailed analysis Why should I do this? Difficulty: Your keyword Your page compared with Google top 10 pages flashusdtsender Volume 0 Position 65 Content Length Top 10 avg: 240 words Your page: 11 words Referring Domains Top 10 avg: 0 Your page: 0 Video Usage Top 10 avg: no Your page: no Keyword Usage Top 10 avg: — Your page: — Ordered List Top 10 avg: yes Your page: no markups Top 10 avg: no Your page: no readability Top 10 avg: 32 Your page: 0