?why admin_users not included
I see your question about the ADMIN_USERS table in the ERD. You're right to notice that while the ADMIN_USERS table is included in the diagram, it doesn't have any relationship connections to the other tables.
The ADMIN_USERS table appears to be isolated in the current ERD because:
To properly represent the role of admin users in the system, we should add these relationships:
These relationships better represent how administrators interact with the system and manage its various components. In a complete system design, these relationships would be implemented through admin interfaces and appropriate access controls.
Would you like me to explain how these admin relationships would be implemented in the actual system?
can u explain the whole erd diagram for me
Let me walk you through the complete Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD) for the A.S.Q.MAESTRA system, explaining each entity, its purpose, attributes, and relationships.
id (integer)Attributes:
first_name, last_name: Client's personal informationemail, phone: Contact informationaddress: Physical location of the clientpassword: Encrypted password for account accessrole: Likely "client" for regular usersstatus: Account status (active, inactive, etc.)created_at, updated_at: Timestamps for record managementadmin_id (integer)Attributes:
username: Admin's login identifierpassword: Encrypted password for admin accessemail: Admin's contact emailcreated_at: When the admin account was createdid (integer)Attributes:
name: Service name (e.g., "Hair Cut & Style")description: Detailed description of the serviceprice: Cost of the serviceduration: Time required for the service (in minutes)category: Main service category (e.g., "haircuts", "treatment")subcategory: More specific classificationstatus: Whether the service is currently offered (active/inactive)image_path: Path to service image (if any)created_at, updated_at: Timestamps for record managementid (integer)Foreign Keys:
user_id: References USERS tableservice_id: References SERVICES tableAttributes:
appointment_date, appointment_time: When the appointment is scheduledservice_type: Type of service requestedstatus: Appointment status (confirmed, cancelled, completed)services: Possibly a comma-separated list of additional servicesnotes: Any special instructions or commentsnotification_sent: Whether notification was sent to the clientcreated_at, updated_at: Timestamps for record managementid (integer)Attributes:
customer_name: Name of the walk-in customerphone: Contact numberservice: Service requestedqueue_date, queue_time: When the customer entered the queuequeue_number: Position in the queuestatus: Queue status (waiting, served, cancelled)notification_sent: Whether notification was sent to the customercreated_at: When the queue entry was createdid (integer)Attributes:
date: The specific date being configuredstatus: Availability status (e.g., "salon" for open, "home" for closed)notes: Any special notes about this datecreated_at, updated_at: Timestamps for record managementuser_id in APPOINTMENTS references id in USERSservice_id in APPOINTMENTS references id in SERVICESWhile not explicitly connected in the original diagram, ADMIN_USERS would logically have these relationships:
This ERD provides a comprehensive foundation for the A.S.Q.MAESTRA system, enabling all the core functionality needed for appointment scheduling and queue management in the salon context.
can u make a paragraph about that erd, i will just put it in our research paper